QuickCheck Tutorial. Thomas Arts. John Hughes. Quviq AB. Queues. Erlang contains a queue data structure. (see stdlib documentation). We want to test that . In Erlang, it’s the usual accepted approach to implement as much as possible on the BEAM. This gives every bit of code the wonderful. check the operations (implement by using QuickCheck). Generator for decimals: decimal() ->?LET(Tuple, {int(),nat()}, new(Tuple)). Able to generate all possible.

Author: Gorn Mikajind
Country: Mauritius
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 8 May 2011
Pages: 147
PDF File Size: 20.25 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.54 Mb
ISBN: 726-7-23785-893-4
Downloads: 74047
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gura

This erlanb used in situations where test outcomes are non – deterministicto search for test cases that consistently fail. Heinz, the Project-FiFo founder and fearless leader. In such cases, have a look to the? QuickCheck uses the power of functional programming to keep specifications concise and readable. Then, since EQC does not know about the second node, we extract the body of the test into its own function. As an example, you may be wrapping your QuickCheck properties in EUnit suites to get code coverage information, or you may run Quickchecck via rebar.

Or even C code, it can even find some memory corruption issues that way.

Testing C code with Erlang QuickCheck – Project-FiFo Blog

By using the following pattern, it will be possible to replay a failing test case and to display only relevant logs. It includes information on projects, publications, research funders and collaborations.

Verify your generators Whenever you implement a new generator or even if you simply use a built-in one, you may want to verify that the generator works qyickcheck you expect.

We’re not sure why. Feedback and support If you have questions, need help, find a bug or just want to give us feedback you may use this form, or contact us per e-mail research. The following notes are listed in a more or less random order and they assume that you are already familiar with QuickCheck EQC and QuickCheck abstract state machines.

State Machine Erlsng It is often convenient to model the system under test via a state machine. It has been an incredibly helpful learning experience, so I thought to share some of the highlights from our discussions to a broader public.


Roberto Aloi

Cases which no-one thought to test crash systems late in development or out in the field, revealing errors which cost time and money to analyze, diagnose, and fix. It enables them to find errors at an earlier stage, lowering costs and quickcheco quality as a result. They look similar at a first glance, so you may qickcheck which one to use. You can build complex generators easily by composing simple ones.

Non derministic test outcomes In certain situations test outcomes are non-deterministic. This gives every bit of code the wonderful characteristics of decent fault handling we love so much. Once again, you are in control: Only the QuickCheck libraries themselves are proprietary. The rpc module will automatically escalate the remote node crashing to a test failure. The simplest way is just to start a erl shell in another window.

Writing something in C is easy! Quickchexk write it in Erlang. If you need to invert this behaviour and you want to shrink – or should I say grow – towards the entire quickchek, you can simply toggle the true boolean and set it to erpang. Research projects at chalmers. Once it finds something that breaks it will then try to simply the events that lead to the disaster and present me with a hopefully minimal test case that can trigger the problem.

QuickCheck tests your properties in randomly generated cases, either interactively or invoked from your test server.

In other wordsthe property passes if Prop sometimes passes. In QuickCheck, going from sequential testing to parallel testing is a snap in most cases. Tired of writing and maintaining thousands of automated tests? Now there eflang a few hurdles in the way however, EQC, to my knowledge, has no build in abstraction for remote execution.

This is also useful to verify the sequence of commands that your abstract state machine quickchecl generate:. The code and tests of the library can be found here: Failing cases are automatically simplified before they are presented to you. A few days ago I had the chance to spend some time with John Hughes, one of the creators of the Erlang Quickcheck. Please try again in a few minutes. However, that is only half the story!


Generating sublists Given a list of quickchecm – say, atoms – you want to extract random sublists from the original list. An extract from the QuickCheck documentation follows.

One way of doing this is to pair each erlzng of the list with a boolean generator and to filter out false values: At the same time, many more cases can be generated, so testing is more thorough. Conventional random testing generates failing cases in which—like failures quickcbeck the field—the signal causing the failure is obscured by a great deal of random noise, making fault diagnosis difficult and costly. And finally writing something in C that does what you think it does and not randomly segfaults or overwrites memory is close to impossible — at least so I blatantly claim without proof or citation other than an empirical study with a sample size of: Before you get the rotten tomatoes and raw eggs out give me a chance to defend my honor.

However, — yes, I know that is what everyone was waiting quic,check, sorry it took me so long — the concept turns completely useless when the C code segfaults and brutally murders the BEAM.

So, before you do anything else you need to be erlag epmd is running on the machine you want to test on. Your QuickCheck specifications consist of properties and generators which describe system behaviour in a specified set of cases.

In your QuickCheck abstract state machine, you could have operations which take long time, so you may want to set a timeout for the entire test suite. QuickCheck can exercise a wider variety of call sequences than you can possibly write manual test cases for. You can use preconditions to ensure logical precedence between operations.

Failing is good Too often your QuickCheck tests pass and your properties are successful. QuickCheck takes you quickly from specification to identified bug. And this works quicocheck for Erlang code!